Question
A microphone receiving a pure sound tone feeds an oscilloscope, producing a wave on its screen. If the sound intensity is originally , but is turned up until the amplitude increases by 30.0%, what is the new intensity?
Final Answer
Solution video
OpenStax College Physics, Chapter 16, Problem 70 (Problems & Exercises)
vote with a rating of
votes with an average rating of
.
Calculator Screenshots
Video Transcript
This is College Physics Answers with Shaun Dychko. The intensity of a sound wave in the first case is 2.00 times 10 to the minus 5 watts per square meter and we are told that the amplitude of the sound is increased such that it will now be 30 percent more than the amplitude was when the original intensity was measured. So to say that the amplitude is gonna be 30 percent more is to say that A 2 will be 1.30 times A 1. So we know that intensity is proportional to amplitude squared which means that I 1—the first intensity— equals some constant of proportionality— whatever it is doesn't matter— multiplied by A 1 squared. because when you say something is proportional to something else, you are saying that it equals some factor multiplied by that thing. So that means I 1 equals some factor Z times A 1 squared; I 2 will be the same factor multiplied by A 2 squared and it's the same factor because it's the same microphone being used with the same area and so on. Now I 2 divided by I 1 will be ZA 2 squared divided by ZA 1 squared and the Z's cancel meaning we have A 2 divided by A 1 squared and A 2 we know is 1.30 times A 1 so we make that substitution in place of A 2 and the A 1's cancel leaving us with 1.30 squared is the ratio of I 2 over I 1. So that means I 2 equals 1.30 squared times I 1. So that's 1.30 squared times 2 times 10 to the minus 5 watts per square meter which is an intensity of 3.38 times 10 to the minus 5 watts per square meter.
Comments
Isn't intensity inversely proportional to area? I keep getting . The final answer I get is .
Hi vanessabudo, thank you for the question. You're quite right that intensity if inversely proportional to area, however, the "A" in the video represents amplitude, not area. That's confusing, I totally understand. The textbook reminds us here that the work done by the wave is proportional to amplitude squared (represented as x in that formula 16.74). Work is implicit in the power term P in equation 16.75, which could be rewritten as . A is area, and since (where I've written the word amplitude instead of the letter A to avoid confusion with area) then so is intensity.
Hope this helps,
Shaun
I am confused on how we know to derive 1.3 from 30%